Policy Differences with Lieberman

What specific policy differences do you have with Senator Lieberman (including and beyond the war)? In short, why should Democrats vote for you instead of him, should you run?

I believe that we as the Democratic party should and I as a senator would push back against some terrible policies, starting with the wrong headed invasion of Iraq and ill-advised tax cuts, and stand up forcefully for a Democratic agenda, which includes healthcare reform, education reform, and energy conservation. The Senator can speak for himself; I would oppose the nomination of Judge Alito since he jeopardizes a woman’s right to choose, I would oppose education vouchers since they undermine our commitment to our public school system, I would have strongly opposed federal intervention in the Terri Shiavo case, I would have pushed for energy conservation and bio fuels as a better alternative than the liquefied natural gas plant in LI Sound; I would oppose diverting social security taxes into private accounts, and I would replace American troops on the front lines in Iraq with Iraqi troops as the first step towards bringing our troops home.

Source:
http://connecticutlocalpolitics.blogspot.com/2006/01/six-questions-for-ned-lamont.html


How do you think Sen. Lieberman does for the Democrats, in terms of helping them provide a check and balance on an executive and a Republican party that basically has just become drunk with power?

I think he undercuts our message. I think he sometime goes out of his way to stick it to the Democrats when we're trying to speak clearly about the war, when we're trying to speak clearly on bankruptcy and Sam Alito and other issues that we've already referenced. He's always right there as George Bush's favorite Democrat and it makes it tougher for the Democrats to be a constructive opposition.

Source: http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2549/

This site is not authorized by any candidate or committee